In addition to sliding poll numbers because of a failing economy, the President is facing harsh criticism from environmentalists young and old.
During the 2008 election campaign, environmentalists were elated to have a presidential candidate who seemed to understand their fight. President Obama campaigned on investing in clean energy, creating jobs through environmental stewardship and reducing America’s dependence on foreign oil
Last month, the White House released it’s energy plan, addressing rising gas prices. At first glance, the plan boasts lofty goals such as a proposal to rely on “clean energy” for 80% of its energy supply. But a closer look shows that the administration puts nuclear, clean coal and natural gas on equal footing with wind and solar.
Activists have called nuclear energy outright dirty and dangerous. “Industry efforts to “greenwash” nuclear energy makes a mockery of clean energy goals….[It’s] the classic jump from the frying pan into the fire!” says Public Citizen, a non-partisan national non-profit that represents consumer interests in Congress, on their website. Clean coal and natural gas raises as much debate as nuclear.
Environmentalists also object to the compromises made in the EPA. One such proposal was the EPA’s decision to limit emissions and reduce pollution from industrial boilers that power factories, smelters, oil refineries and chemical plants. The battle over the boilers stretches back to 2004 when Earthjustice filed a suit against the EPA for tougher regulations on manufacturers to protect public health.
The suit prompted the EPA to issue stronger rules last year but was met by intense criticism from the industry claiming that it would kill jobs and cost billions of dollars to implement. In support of the industry, President Obama issued an executive order for the EPA to nix any “burdensome regulation.” Shortly thereafter, the EPA decided to table it indefinitely.
The displeasure amongst young environmentalists does not necessarily reflect the feelings of young voters nationwide however. In a Harvard Institute of Politics poll, 55% of all voters between the ages of 18 and 25 approve of the President’s job performance. Amongst college students, the percentage raised to 60%. But despite high approval ratings, young voters are hesitant to back the President in the 2012 elections.
The most important issue for these voters is the economy. In February of 2011, 43% feel their economic situation is “very” or “fairly bad” and 22% are currently looking for work. When asked whether they will vote for him in 2012, only 38% say they will while 25% say they plan to vote for his Republican opponent. The rest are unsure. While young voters have stuck beside President Obama, it seems the spirit of “Yes We Can” has faded.
Photos by AP
